 |
|
In the old times, an
artist would create in his studio, then he would find an institution to
exhibit his artwork, would possibly get the recognition he felt he
deserved, maybe find a patron willing to invest in his future career,
have his artwork sold, acquire a following and so on. This is the
traditional scheme of things, which some might say it still applies
nowadays in its basic structure, but somehow, it feels more complicated
than this, and it has become difficult to define a universally valid
pattern of how things should be working. The outline seems to have
changed tremendously in the last decades, due to new developments which
occur on a daily basis and which have modified the paradigm and the
dynamic of the relationship between the artist and the art consumer. The
most important phenomenon is definitely the ascent of the internet that
allows effortless circulation of information, and has also produced an
entirely new medium.
Nowadays, we live in a world in permanent evolution due to the
technological breakthroughs, and sometimes innovation surfaces in more
places simultaneously; as a result, artwork is more than ever shaped
with the permanent obsession of originality. The gender separation
between different art forms does not exist so blatantly any more,
because everything is transmitted through the same media and in fact,
even the gap between objective reality and its effigies has become more
elusive than ever.
Another issue that has ascended to the forefront is that we live in an
age of extreme diversity, where artists have the option to orient
themselves towards a larger variety of media, while also exploiting to
the maximum the traditional and established ones. Although the subject
matters still stem from a combination of factors, either personal
experience, an interpretation of the meaningful social issues, a flight
from the overwhelming Big Brother reality or exploiting it critically by
means of cultural quotes, there is much more to be said about the
plethora of factors that have influenced the development of art trends
nowadays.
|
|
Perhaps as never before,
one can notice that the centralized identity model of an artist is
subjected to intense erosion due to the constant bombardment of
information. An artistic trend develops, grows old and ends up in the
same depository with yesterday’s and tomorrow’s trends. We live in a
frenzy of last moment information, 5-minute celebrity, live war and life
spent online, shared by millions of users, and contemplation is rarely
possible. The user is not necessarily unhappy with the offer and
responds to the stimuli every time the ads are on, and the result may be
an overwhelming saturation. What applies to other fields of our daily
lives is also of importance for the type of artwork we choose, or we are
exposed to, and the extreme variety is only making any attempt to
classify and judge more difficult than ever.
Artists often regard their artwork as a free projection of a personal
feeling, but they have to shape their style in competition with others,
with the wish to be unique.
The power of this originality is intensely eroded
by a flood of ads, fashion images and others. More recently, style and
personal information, in the new communication paradigm, have become
information packets, valid for short periods of time, and then rapidly
ejected from the system as redundant. Everything is transmitted using
the same digital code, and art can materialize all over the world
simultaneously. The Renaissance paradigm of the unique, artist-defined
perspective to be perceived by the art consumer seems to elude more than
ever a clear definition. The artist and the art consumer are not
necessarily the origin and the destination any more; they become just
turning points in the complex informational flow.
There are still numerous artists that use the traditionally established
media, such as painting or sculpture, to convey their vision of the
world. Their artwork has a craft component which cannot be ignored: in
order to produce an artistic object, a certain set of actions have to be
understood and performed, and the desired result can be obtained only
after mastering the craft aspect.
|
|
And then, there is the
other category, the artists who have rapidly incorporated, albeit in a
transitional manner, the new media, namely the computer as a tool of
artwork creation. They still use as a referent the real world, and
attempt to depict in a representational manner what they perceive as
important from the surrounding environment, but their tools are not the
brush or the pencil anymore, but computer software which helps, by means
of a limited set of preset choices, to express their personal vision.
Why in a transitional manner? Namely because they have only switched
from using one set of tools to another set, which are more modern and
which, in a way, level the playing field. If before, one had to master
the technique, nowadays, the ideas can be put in practice if one has
access to a computer and the appropriate software. The result of their
artistic pursuit is still an object though, which can be printed or
rendered tri-dimensional by means of a printer of a rapid prototyping
machine.
Now more than ever, in the age of diversity and permanent change, when
we can have a hard time choosing from one hundred kinds of shampoo in
the drugstore, it is necessary if not to operate categorization, to
document the phenomenon and put together a catalogue, either as an
orientation for the art public, or simply, such as in this case, to
inventory the variety of art forms and individual creations and/or
trends that are endlessly moving in front of our eyes. Due to the ascent
of the internet, more and more artists have chosen this as their
primordial means of showing the public what is going on, and anthologies
such as this serve a higher purpose, namely to document an elusive
phenomenon and bring to the fore artists who can thus understand more
how their individual creations shape the world we all live in, what is
the responsibility of a creative consciousness, and where they stand in
the grander scheme of things.
________________________________________
Dana Altman
Art Critic, Curator
New York, 2006
One Hundred Contemporary Artists©
|
|